Range Rover Sport SDV6 Autobiography

Page 106 of the new Range Rover Sport’s owner’s manual contains the
following revelation: ‘this vehicle is not designed for cornering at the
same speed as conventional passenger cars any more than a low-slung
sports car is designed to perform satisfactorily under off-road
conditions. If at all possible, avoid sharp turns or abrupt manoeuvres.’
Having driven the Range Sport around Rockingham’s soaking infield
circuit 0.6sec faster than our ‘low-slung’ Subaru BRZ long-termer, that
first bit of text is clearly cobblers’. Hold the Tipp-Ex on the second
part, though, because I’ve just ploughed the Range Sport through an old
quarry lake, water lapping over its headlights and a tsunami-sized bow
wave threatening to engulf photographer Greg Pajo as I powered back onto
dry land. After that, I don’t feel compelled to put a brand new
Japanese sports car into a salvage auction to prove the point.

'An automotive Swiss Army knife'
It’s an automotive Swiss Army knife, this Range Rover Sport, and very
few cars have ever come anywhere close to its level of all-encompassing
ability. We’re not driving the bells and whistles 5.0-litre
supercharged Sport with its 503bhp and 461lb ft, either: this is the
SDV6, a car that sits just one step up from the bottom of the range and
one that Brits will typically buy. Its 3.0-litre twin-turbo diesel makes
288bhp and 443lb ft while promising 38mpg and 199g/km. You’ll pay from
£60k, that figure rising to – hark the press car bells and whistles –
£75k for our highfalutin Autobiography specification with its sliding
panoramic roof , 18-way powered leather seats, heated steering wheel,
three-zone climate and various other fripperies.
If you’ve ever driven the outgoing Range Sport, trading up to the new model will feel like stepping out of a pair of concrete boots. Push on down a tricky B-road and, yes, the 2005 Range Sport would show its bigger, lumbering Range Rover father a clean pair of heels, but then the 2002 Range Rover liked to roll about like a cat in a heatwave. It was the comparison with rivals – not relatives – that spotlighted the Sport’s deficiencies: it felt like a hefty, sometimes chaotic car to hustle and its Cayenne and X5/X6 classmates were a year advanced when it came to physics lessons. Not any more.
If you’ve ever driven the outgoing Range Sport, trading up to the new model will feel like stepping out of a pair of concrete boots. Push on down a tricky B-road and, yes, the 2005 Range Sport would show its bigger, lumbering Range Rover father a clean pair of heels, but then the 2002 Range Rover liked to roll about like a cat in a heatwave. It was the comparison with rivals – not relatives – that spotlighted the Sport’s deficiencies: it felt like a hefty, sometimes chaotic car to hustle and its Cayenne and X5/X6 classmates were a year advanced when it came to physics lessons. Not any more.

That’s because while the new model is still recognisably a Range
Rover Sport – you need to see old and new side-by-side to really
appreciate the quite radical differences – an engineering revolution
lies at its core. The old Sport’s steel bodyshell was attached to a
cut-and-shut Discovery T5 ladder-frame chassis; the new model features
an aluminium monocoque that’s derived from the new Range Rover but is in
fact 75% new.
'Land Rover hasn’t just rescued the Range Sport from a tailspin'

At a still-hefty 2115kg, our diesel V6 is nonetheless a substantial
420kg lighter – equivalent to a car full of adults each carrying a heavy
suitcase! – than its predecessor, and it’s stiffer too, which means the
engineers have been able to tune the suspension – double wishbone
front, multi-link rear, air springs all round – for extra handling
precision. The new Range Sport is lighter, it’s more agile, it’s faster,
it’s more fuel-efficient – Land Rover hasn’t just rescued the Range
Sport from a tailspin, they’ve pulled back on the controls and turned it
into a virtuous circle.
But while experiments on-track and off-road illustrate the extremes
of this car’s competencies, it’s the bit in the middle that we need to
focus on, the bit that virtually every Range Sport owner is going to
spend 100% of their time doing: driving it on the road.

You climb into a cabin that feels almost a carbon copy of the new
Range Rover with its aggressively angled dash, simplified interfaces and
luxurious finishes. The corners of the car are easy to identify from
the driver’s seat, the cockpit feels light and airy and rearward
visibility is good considering you’re dealing with almost five metres of
metal – our car’s reversing camera ably makes up for the bits you can’t
see, and it’s a worthwhile £300 option on low-spec cars.

'Trading regal for racy'
Yet there are some important distinctions versus the Range Rover, and
they subtly signal what’s in store before you even press the starter
button: the rotary gear selector is gone, replaced by a stubby Jaguar
F-type stick; you sit lower in seats that remain extremely comfortable
but offer far more aggressive lateral support; and the steering wheel is
noticeably smaller, a clear nod that you’re trading regal for racy.

It’s a fabulous ambience, one that’s let down only by a pair of
clicky, cheap-feeling paddleshifters and that dated infotainment system
that’s still too unintuitive and requires too many button pushes to
access its functions. The new shortcut buttons that border the screen
are a partially successful fix, but they’re sticking plasters that
disguise a deeper malaise. Arms shorter than a T-Rex? Just try tapping
the ‘menu’ button on the far left of the screen: the rakish dash means
it’s as out of reach as the ticket at the multi-storey car-park barrier.
The German rotary controllers do it better, and one day Jaguar Land
Rover will abandon this entire philosophy in favour of something more
intuitive and less distracting. Preferably something that better
compliments the slick TFT renderings of analogue dials that fill the
instrument binnacle on our top-spec car (lower specs get plain old
dials, sorry).

But on the A1, heading for North Yorkshire, the niggling gripes melt
into the background because the Range Sport proves a faultless
companion: the ride quality on our 21-inch rims is superb, a spot-on
combination of tied-down body control and easy, indulgent compliance;
wind and tyre-noise is a distant hum; the eight-speed auto slips through
its ratios like a blackjack dealer expertly shuffling the pack and the
V6 turbodiesel is happy to play wallflower.

Despite its dynamic brief, the Range Sport cocoons like a limo, and
it’s far kinder to those in the back than it once was, largely because
the dimensions are suitably enlarged: the wheelbase stretches by 178mm,
and it’s 4mm lower and 62mm longer too. So the boot is larger at 784
litres – though it still looks relatively small for such a big car, the
high boot floor disguising our optional, whopping full-size spare that
now sits under the carpet rather than dangling below the chassis like a
cow that’s missed a milking. That stretch in wheelbase means the looks
are far better balanced than the truncated original, and there’s more
space for rear-seat lounging – you can even recline the rear seats for a
properly business-class experience. The rear headrests might be far
firmer than the S-class-like plumpness that indulges those up front, but
George Michael will be no safer from dozily plunging onto the fast lane
of the M1 than he was while relaxing in the back seats of any other
Range Rover.

Not convinced that a car this big and seemingly practical can seat
only five? You can spec a part-time third row of seats, and they could
prove a life-saver for larger families and celebrity narcoleptics alike,
though for rather different reasons.

'Best-of-both-world’s fix for agility and ride quality'
A couple of hours of painless dual-carriageway schlepping and we’re
off the major routes, ready to scythe across the epic sweeps and
undulations of the Yorkshire Dales. It’s at this point that Land Rover
suggests you hand over a little more cash: base cars get standard
dampers and anti-roll bars, but you can also choose active dampers and
standard anti-roll bars while high-spec models get a Dynamic chassis
that heralds active dampers and active anti-roll bars that firm up
during cornering but de-couple on the straights to give a
best-of-both-world’s fix for agility and ride quality. Range Sports that
come with that latter option also come with an electronically
controlled rear locking differential and torque-vectoring tech.

Absolutely no prizes for guessing that the press office has supplied
us with a Dynamic-equipped car, something that’s absent from the TDV6
and base SDV6 models, coming on stream only with the £65k SDV6 HSE
Dynamic and our £75k SDV6 Autobiography.
Reach down to the Terrain Response dial – usually synonymous with its
mud and ruts and grass/gravel/snow off-road settings – and switch it to
the squiggly road symbol and you’ll tap into the full
performance-boosting spectrum that the Dynamic cars offer: it firms up
the dampers, adds a bit more weight to the steering and diverts
additional torque from the front to the rear wheels.
Unlike some German rivals, there’s not a massively pronounced difference between the dampers in their Dynamic and standard modes, but you do notice that the body control tightens up and the chassis stops its light rocking back and forth, and yet the trade-off in ride quality is so small that you could easily forget that you’ve gone hardcore, and end up defaulting to it all the time. I did; I preferred it.
Unlike some German rivals, there’s not a massively pronounced difference between the dampers in their Dynamic and standard modes, but you do notice that the body control tightens up and the chassis stops its light rocking back and forth, and yet the trade-off in ride quality is so small that you could easily forget that you’ve gone hardcore, and end up defaulting to it all the time. I did; I preferred it.

The steering – an electro-mechanical system the like of which is so
often whinged about when we’re road-testing Porsches – is beautiful:
nicely weighted, quick, responsive and accurate, and there are even
subtle hints of the fizz and buzz of the road surface making its way
back up through the rack.

And we already know that this thing can carve corners, right? There’s
limited roll and tenacious grip from the front end that will cede to
understeer if you’re over-ambitious, but more likely you’ll sense that
you’ve worked the front tyres to their limits and ease the car into the
corner, then get back on the throttle really early and let the E-diff
and torque vectoring and anti-roll bars do their thing, swooping you
through the apex and powering you out of a bend that’d see you
disappearing for a spot of spontaneous off-roading if you tried the same
thing at the same speed in the old car.

'It feels mischievously good to drive'
Throw in a sodden surface and you’d have some difficulty shifting a
well-driven Range Sport from the rear-view mirror of a modern
performance car such are its point-to-point abilities. The elevated
seating position makes sighting cross-country easy, gives excellent
visibility for overtaking, and then you just lean on that chassis,
knowing that there’s abundant grip, that there’ll be no lurching and
untidy compressing of suspension as you flick-flick through direction
changes. It feels mischievously good to drive.

There is an Achilles heel for our SDV6, though, and it’s a big one:
it’s just not quick enough, the powertrain relying on the brilliant
chassis to supply the speed rather than the grunt alone. The same engine
in a Jag XF Sportbrake feels only just potent enough to deliver the
kind of thrust we’ve been so spoilt with in modern six-pot turbodiesels.
In the Range Sport, with an extra 235kg to lug, it feels noticeably
blunted, and at first you’ll probably shift down when you feel the
mid-range isn’t quite delivering the pace you expected, only to find
yourself rapidly climbing out of the powerband and wishing there was
more top-end to exploit. The reluctant, soggy throttle response doesn’t
help the cause, either.

It leaves a gap for a rival to nip in and romp to glory, and that
rival already exists: a Porsche Cayenne Diesel S is yours for £58k – £2k
cheaper than a basic SDV6 – and its V8 turbodiesel blows our test car
so far into the weeds that you’ll need every bit of the Range Sport’s
four-wheel-drive hardware to get it back out again. Is the Cayenne as
good off-road? Probably not, but we know that’s its abilities are still
far beyond what pretty much anyone out there actually requires.

The Range Sport stands as a massive achievement, a car I’d happily
own and recommend, but the Cayenne Diesel S does everything that you
actually need it to do as well or better and it’s yours for less cash –
as much as £7k less if you factor in the Dynamic kit you’ll need to make
your Range Sport handle like ours. How do you argue with that?
Words: Ben Barry Photography: Greg Pago
0 commentaires: